bifido

This document is an arm of the bifido machinery.

If you wish finding all of it as a single webpage, see the bifido (all).

constraints

Constraints (things that have to be considered in a specification, and then, in real-life, they may turn out to make "your" former plans impractical) may be actually helpful to you -- especially, if/when those interfering constraints derail some "plan" imposed to your mind by some evil.

For example, from the existing manually-fighting martial arts systems, how Wing Chun (&, thereby, Jeet Kune Do) & with different strategy also (real) Tai Chi both fit to bifido is, respectively, their (1) dominating-the-centerline-&-interception-with-a-fist, & (2) the having-trained-for-possible-maneuvers-to-counteract-against-& looking-for-opportunities-to-match-those-to-the-acts-of-the-opponent. Why thought-controllers cannot derail these aspects, is because they are FIXED rules (you could call them almost "static" (over time) although dynamic (ready) for every moment) and so, irrespective of how many seconds the opponent may inflict whims to your mind, the moment he/she/it falls to a situation (a constraint for him/her/it) you know how to handle, then he/she/it is caught at it (unless they have stolen from your mind or somebody else's mind a technique that works against your technique).

In contrast, the sort of (high-kicking, etc.) "positive-fighting" (external style) Kung Fu (not looking like quite "real Chen Tai Chi" to me) you see in some (most?) videos out there (some "Chen Tai Chi" tournament finals, Tai-Chi-vs-other-style tournaments), seem quite vulnerable to manipulation by thought-controllers.

Actually, I have thought (just thinking, yet) some further styles (fitting to those of us who may have fast designer/programmer/debugger/debunker minds) to do design-&-constraints-based (not only analysis-&-react-based) bifido, too, but the essentials w.r.t what exists out there, is that it is nice to have a firm strength in the offense-through-defense techniques, not to let the evil establish some evil progress.

BTW, that is not limited to feet-&-fists fighting. To defend your business against thought-controllers, is quite similar, as they would like to build their following evil plans, upon your falling to their previous attempts -- if you have no way of return.

In other words, break their traps, return to your firm basis (or, wish-list(s)), & trap (& harm) them when they attempt, instead of "trying your chances" wildly.

To make the best of the constraints, whether they are constraints that limit you or your enemy, you should have related items ready in your wish-list(s) (maybe a large repertoire of what-else-to-do, or some sure-fire-method-to-fall-back-to, or what harms your enemy most)

-- or, upon weighing the new opportunities, sometimes, you may prefer adding them into your wish-list(s), too, if they fulfill your overall constraints (religious, etc).

BTW, religious constraints themselves, have been useful against lots of abusers -- if your religion has such constraints that block away what those abusers lobby to you.

BTW, I presume that the thought-controllers-&-conspirators are all cursedly stupids ("but" living parasitic (as abusers) to their victims' minds). Both your & their actions may harm them -- as long as you are determined to harm them infinitely/boundlessly, in contrast to leniency/hesitation/etc. So, their harmful plan that was a trap against you, may start to harm themselves.

BTW, while at it, if you notice that something-in-your-mind (other than yourself) is like urging you continuing with a plan that has become impractical because of the new constraints, then you may notice that as a possible cue about what trap they have prepared against you. But (because you know the other trickery) they may try to use that in a stream-of-lies, too, for diverting you from something that is actually useful. Therefore, at least, the manipulation is noticed, & then you need to think.

As concerns the conspiracy-theory that "Jews have had no successes, at all" (such as all of their Nobels being either stolen content or confessional (& then, lobbying into minds of the Nobel jury)), one may wonder how did they (if the theory is/were right), made it in chess championships, too. Not that I value chess (neither personal preference, nor after learning in cognitive psychology that chess-mastership is mainly rote-memorization-based) but it is a question worthy of solving about a seemingly openly played tournaments category. Now, consider the (Jewish-or-not, but necessarily thought-controller) chess poseurs, & how to play against them:

• suspecting that somebody is probably stealing/thoughtcontrolling at chess, too?
• they may be remotely looking up some pre-recorded database of chess-moves (similar to how a thief Jew may steal from my mind something I invented, and it carries that, enmeshedly-or-per-request, to a Jew's mind (or, to other requestor, or sometimes, to stain the target)
• suspecting that the opponent's play is based on what you had thought as unwishable? Know how to play against your previous plans if/when you find out that the opponent behaves according to that. That is, after it/they commit to that plan (or, when they played the pawn/figure that you thought/feared).
• good news is that, neither you nor whomever else they remotely consult while playing against you, can see beyond a limited amount of moves. So, until/unless the end-game is within seeable amount of moves, whatever move has happened, may have caused your opponent becoming stuck at some dead-end-street

Your using the environment to the fullest, makes the "zeitgeistly" thieves (the thought-controllers which read your mind) less able to ask it to others (for finding some way to fight back against you). That is, unlike a chess-board that is quickly summarizable & remotely askable to a chess-master's mind). That is, the more details you have significant/substantial plans to work with profitably, they have to carry that information as part of the question, to someone who is not there around you, and while doing such carrying, they may make lots of communication errors (such as children's games where each relays what she/he heard from one side to the other side, but so often, the message is changed from one end (start), to the other side.

Furthermore, if you're alone (that is, not needing to explain your plans to others with full words/reports/briefings/etc), you may think with words you make your own jargon that is not necessarilty 1-to-1 translatable to any language. That is, your own little language(s) that you understand very well (not confusing you), but others may have trouble in adopting/translating.

trolling

Those who read your mind (& then they make plans based on that), may all be harmed.

For example, if your thoughts were misleading to them, or if after they took their "illuminatedly" positioned stands (like dead-end streets), then you (bifido-style) changed your plan (after seeing what some/all of them have done).

This sort of trolling (& anything that capitalizes on the accumulated results), may be considered a category of (developed-over-time) constraints -- and/or a sort of wish-list item.

As a constraints subcategory, you may like to call it active constraints (in contrast to what may just happen without any of your actions or responses), dynamic constraints (not static but developing/modifiable/modified), or situational constraints.

When something goes wrong, you may have alternatives of it, and afterward, something else changes, & you may just resume from where it was left unfinished.

let them wish they never had it

Make their resources burden against themselves.