Ready.
the bifido name-&-history
bifido strategies
bifido wish-list(s)
evil's insecurity
forts & fronts
Mission: Infinite Vengeance
retroviruses learning to harm themselves
business
stomach
constraints
do NOT try to confuse (nor "randomize"/jerk) your own mind
progress
"alzheimer" trickery
beware fitna
bifido vis-à-vis Jeet-Kune-Do
bifido vis-à-vis Tai Chi Chuan
footnotes & referrables
Do you find it tiresome when others fight you for the TV-zapper? How would you feel if the-most-extremely-evil-gangs turn out to be fighting against you, to control your mind and body? Ideally, there would be no such thing. But in the real world, there are, & you may need bifido.
Ideally, (1) there would be no thought-controllers (those reading & manipulating your mind), (2) or we would be able to kill them (such as by targeting a witch-epigene), as soon as they attempt such thought-control -- and if the assault is happening through intermediaries (and maybe offline) then you need having protection against genies, while detecting-&-disabling the waves/machines, too, & hoping that all this suffices.
For the real world, I suggest bifido, a palette of strategies for various aspects of life, re-inforcing each other (for total warfare, as well as metaphor, such as business-strategies to street-fight), for winning even when your cards are open (& the enemy tries to manipulate).
Without bifido (& no sure way to disable their thought-control), you may have little or no chance of success, that is, if they can read your mind (& then planning troubles against you), maybe even before you go to the city where the evil is.
In other words, my aim is to facilitate any person for disabling-&-harming the thought-controllers which would otherwise try to have (evil) advantages through their thought-control-based trickery. That is, I do not intend to publish (a bag-of-tricks, technologies, or philosophy) to-make-its-readers-become-more-successful-against-"anybody"-out-there-but-against-thought-controllers (because, otherwise, that would (perhaps) help the evil readers (thought-controllers, etc), too).
For example, if some JewishMAFIA wants to manipulate-and/or-exterminate you (whether because your business obstructs/impedes their hegemony aims, or because you are a head-hunter targeting them), then their (evil) thought-control may bug you.
For example, if you are a vengeant individual (or, an honest detective officer, or a real (non-conspirator) journalist) who wishes to track down some JewishMAFIA branch, or you are a head-hunter who wants to track down some fugitives.
Then you may need to have such power-tools, bifido, against thought-controllers.
I firstly thought of the name of bifido because of a pun, or two, afterward developing that, further.
Firstly (January 2017, or 2016), I thought of the "suffix" do (the Japanese word "way, path" as appearing in the names of Judo, JeetKuneDo), and (while discussing about copycat83) my prior words endorsing yogurt (probiotics) as a strategy of defense against "zeitgeistly" thieves (thought-controllers). BTW, although I knew that mainly two bacteria define the yogurt, I was not exactly remembering what bifido was but sure that it had something related to yogurt, and then by re-reading from my archive (old wikipedia page), I noticed that it isoptional (but well suggested) for yogurts, and it is probiotic, too. In other words, for most aspects (especially for bifidoAFM), when that aspect is important, both yogurt & bifido are equivalent terms, for all practical purposes so far I have thought of.
When you trim that "do" as if a suffix, then the attention comes to the puns fitting that stem portion. That could be, for example, (either or both of) bi-fidelity (like high-fidelity is hi-fi), or beefy.
bi-fidelity (making best of yourself & the situation, & similarly having strategies against your enemy's self-&-stituation) -- btw, zilqarneyn's zi(l) means having ownership or mastery, & qarneyn means "double" (or, "both"), such as both-bodily-&-spiritually, or both-in-this-world-&-the-next, that is, without having prowess for both aspects, not like a single-winged bird.
"beefy do" ("beefy" means muscles (a term I had first read in a comment/discussion to some article, as referring to "body-building"), & I extend it to mean, real or metaphor, strength of whatever reason (chi, whatever)), that is good against bugs that may try to inflict their weaknesses/jerkinesses to you, when they (try to) couple themselves to you, synchronously. For example, in walking (I had already thought of a possible "street-fighting" sysytem that resembles "street-walking" firstly because of vengeance against the jerky/awkward evil trying to mess with my walking, & then, as a personal style instead of adopting Tai Chi or so) -- & fits to any act that prefers having a standing-powerfully-on-the-feet.
Next, what was already developed, w.r.t. those second-&-third puns, became extra fittingly meaningful, when I noticed the formula, biFi (in computer programming (simulations), b[i]F[i], but on blackboard, it is written with subscripts, not square brackets). That is, a force equation (in a video of MIT OCW 2.003 Kim VanDiver lectures), and refers to body parameters, and that exactly reflected how I had been thinking. After all, there are field(s) (ergonomy, biophysics) with formulas for such weight-loads, too.
(Feb.11,2018) BifidoAFM stands for AreaFillingMethods (like how you have to "dance around" or take control, when breaking into a room full of various opponents and non-opponents, and your team may have multiple people, too), quite related to how bifido/yogurt bacteria "fight" within your gut, to disable the evil microbes.
Finally, I should mention that, as all of this is happening while the armageddon is continuing, and those disgusting bugs bugging me are presumably mostly hereticJews/sabbataists, they tried (Aug.12,2017) to heckle/derail the name of bifido, too (as is customary for all good things, throughout recent centuries, maybe millenia, such as how alcohol-prohibition in USA was abused by Jews toward increasing crimes, how marital age is postponed later & later by law, etc, etc). In this case, the disgusting types tried to disgust me with obscene heckling "because" bifido is not only in gut but also genital area defense. That is no cause for retraction but highlighting, I think, because this fight is exactly about that, too. Thought-controllers have ruined the chastity of lots of people, as I have already written a lot about it (for example, look around to see the decoupled victims). As such, this bifido, is for protection (by facilitating your annihilating those who do such thought-control assaults that aim to puppetize you, and as long as the assault continues, their jerky/pathological bodies, erectile assaults, gas-bloat assaults, urination-trigger assaults, whatever weaknesses they aim to inflict, would remain there, till you disable them forever). So, this may be thought of the "external" kind of bifido, that becomes a shelter, that finally relieves those bifido bacteria within your body from facing the spurious (totally externally imposed) effects/diseases of the antichrist gangs.
Irrelevantly, I may also mention that upon a YouTube search for the word "bifido" (that was Oct.24,2017 (or, so), months later than having thought all of the above). Then, I noticed lots of videos of a showman from Italy. I don't know what he is talking about 9nor whether he ever compared-7-contrasted himself to a bifidobacterium), but probably his content is not very related to this sort of bifido I'm thinking & talking about.
I presume that your enemy differs from you, in lots of ways (most of the time), including
Capitalize on such differences because they are your resources, for example, good against their copycat attempts to transfer-or-imitate your advantages, may both interfere with their existing system and expose them as thieves bugging-&-stealing from you. A thing that is a remedy for you (in your own situation) may be a poison to them (in their own situations).
In other cases, if some difference seems to be your disadvantage, then noticing this, may facilitate your improving yourself, but that may also be a thought-controller assault that brainwashes you to "see" your strengths as if your weaknesses.
BTW, as such, so far, bifido may seem as only a "subcategory" of what is generally known as "asymmetric warfare" but (as usual, with almost any term) there is no guarantee that what you may find out there with that jargon (through internet or your library) would resemble how I would suggest (including the potential that they may change the definitions). Therefore, bifido is just bifido. Read my words for it.
A good principle, a realistic way of seeing the truth, is always helpful. For example, I hate thought-controllers-&-their-conspirators (& I presume-&-pray that they are maximum-hell-bound unredeemable evil) and they may never be trusted. This good-principled attitude simplifies the decisions for me (& for you, presuming that you agree with me in hating & not trusting such people & genies). This forbids any agreements with them (& any leniency to them), and as a result, provides defense against their treachery tactics (including "repentance" which actually aims changing you, instead of themselves, any way). This also facilitates defining a few terms (for example, trust, defense, self, optimizing, progress, ...) that are valuable.
A progress is by harming (& not benefiting) them (the thought-controllers side) in ways they cannot recover easily (or, preferrably, never). In contrast, it is not a progress for me, if when I invent something, then the thought-controller(s) reading my mind, can get its patent -- at least, until that patent expires (& then, I have to use any expired patents against their businesses). Similarly, if I would develop a street-power martial arts technique that my enemies may read from my mind, or if it is copyable by simply watching (& they may then try to disable me, if there is a way to disable me, and train their gangs with it), then it is not really (necessarily) a progress for me (but even then, one may try to exploit their troubles, such as, if their pre-existing martial arts, causes confusion for them, when combined with my design).
The material of bifido is the strategies (systems, rules-of-thumbs, warnings, ...). That is not in any sense of neglecting the tactics-need; the strategies include a few that explain fine-tuning-the-tactics-to-yourself-&-your-enemy (to make it easier for you while harder for your enemy).
In summary,
1. notEverybodyIs@front The hidden@fort may hide&communicate
2. design your mechanisms (& martial arts) to be optimized for yourself
3. cherish your wish-list -- keep ready for the opportunities fitting your wishes
4. real-world-constraints may help good results
5. do NOT try to confuse (nor "randomize"/jerk) your own mind
6. Harming them is the (good) progress. Be maximally harmful to the (verifiedly) identified enemies; No peace with them (resist brainwash)
7. mind your business, too
If the evil's "security" is thought-control-based, then it harbors their insecurity, too, when bifido confronts them. For example, you may have forts & fronts to keep your strategists behind forts (if you have any such forts) or (at least, if/when feasible) pseudo-forts.
-- along with the other aspects of bifido that take care against various abuses of thought-controllers attempted against your people at the fronts, too.
Do it your-style -- by firstly making a style tuned to yourself.
cherish your bifido wish-list(s) -- just keep ready for the opportunities fulfilling your wishes
constraints need to be cherished -- & doing that may contain bonuses
do NOT try to confuse (nor "randomize"/jerk) your own mind as if that would "confuse the thought-controllers" -- which may the opposite of the truth, because they may be less able
be maximally harmful to the (verifiedly) identified enemies, at every opportunity. That keeps things realistic, as opposed to draggedly living in their scenario imposed into your mind.
Mission: Infinite Vengeance
progress
retroviruses learning to harm themselves
killing the image
"alzheimer" trickery
beware fitna
The bifido business works with constraints & wish-lists, & it is a fight, too.
Like having a wish-list, or like research steps that you do not have to test one or the other as the earliest, you may have a "wish-list" of things-to-do, in battle, too. Such as if you have to smash the bullet-proof helmet of your opponent(s) and also unbalance/break them in other ways, you may check the list one by one, as opportunities happen, at any moment. Not necessarily going through a fixed series of steps, that is. Just ensure that the list is sufficiently fulfilled (& that is, perhaps not all, but some portion is sufficient, & your enemy probably cannot know which exact moves you will find feasible, & having more than necessary items there in the wish-list, makes those reading your mind cautious about doing more of the actions rather than trying not to facilitate only a smaller list of wishables). (For me, that is like designing new processes/algorithms for new configurations, while others, such as Tai Chi people may see it like their having some fixed actions and looking for opportunities to apply them.
Have wish-lists for various aspects of life (& know how they relate to each other, if they really relate). Keeping the wish-lists separate, modular, may help in keeping them each relatively little & well-organized, & thanks to this, that wish-list (module) may be more conveniently useable (triggered) when its time (the opportunity or need) comes. The wish-lists may work for any of various time-scales, such as the immediate-list(s) that may apply when doing a street-fight, long-term lists that may apply as you accumulate resources-or-results, & situational wish-lists that apply if-or-when opportunities present. For example, for the business aspects of bifido.
BTW, a hadith from Muhammed (s.a.s.) states "The aims of a believer, are better than his/her acts/achievements." Sounds reminding this, as the wish-list may have hopes for maximum achievements, too, but such options need not always present in fate.
Who protects the evil ones? With what kind of "intelligence" is such a "security"(or,army/etc)-of-the-evil keeping some evil beyond your reach, harmful to you-and/or-others? If their only (the key) "advantage" is reading your mind and trying to disadvantage their opponents through thought-control, then you may have bifido strategies to outmaneuver-&-exterminate them.
For example, you may hide within a fort that is sheltered from thought-controllers and/or you may do a double-blind mission (sending a person that does not know you and/or the mission, to do the job).
It should not surprise you that "the key" of their success has been so effective in making dummy personnel seem successful, when you think of it that (1) in warfare, whole technologies have been successful-or-not depending on how they relate to RADAR, & if you can circumvent RADAR, your aircraft may have the extra advantage against even otherwise "more powerful" technologies, (2) when such degeneracy exists, they can not have a meritocracy among themselves, either, because greed and ability are not necessarily correlated, & this also empowers your plans against companies that have hired lots of masons or Jews, too, presuming that those have little more than greed & "human"-networking (not necessarily better than randomly hiring among themselves, or randomly distributing clothes (of any sizs) among themselves, because the real success-or-not is not tested against the real-world, their internal greed-level may have been the 2nd key, among the thought-controllers-&-conspirators), (3) they're the antichrist gangs & cursedly-stupid.
BTW, the physical aspects of fighting (as well as weapons-secrets stealing, or urges for non-using, etc) are already included in "the key" that is mentioned. For example, if some dummy-level poseurs turn out to pass around as (sports-arena) "champion"s, or ("hell-week"-tests-manipulator) "SpecOp"s, despite a lot less qualified than other candidates, then how would you explain it? To me, such a result would suggest that their rivals were extra-burdened through assaults to their minds (synchs to their bodies, & wrong choices through driven whims), & only some a-lot-more-qualified people could have the equal-or-more chances as the (relatively) dummy-like ones which have the support of the thought-controllers.
Actually, that may be the most needed thing because of the very fundamental reasons: (1) the real ultimate very excessively evil types, that is, those that you would really most want to make war to exterminate, happen to be such (satanical/antichristish) witchcraft-doers, & (2) wherever some sports has direct or indirect opportunity (money, etc) then those types may arrange it that himself/herself/themselves or his/her/their supported player/team win(s).
BTW, HenryFord's book suggests that NathanRothschild went to watch the Waterloo battle to do the trickery that he did afterward (pretended selling, while his agents were buying stocks) [HF]. That itself is worthy of mention (& I may suggest a few strategies against such news-manipulation (or, "economy") based assaults, at other sections, as it relates to bifido (& barter-circuits, firmazing)). Furthermore, if that Rothschild was a sabbataist/frankist/kabbalist witch, then perhaps he was watching there not only to see the results of the battle but also doing thought-control to confuse Napoleon's mind (and/or the minds of those taking orders from Napoleon), and also (the extra that could be less effective if he were remote), he was probably informing those on his side about what Napoleon's intentions were, at any critical decision Napoleon considered, & taking their advice how to misdirect Napoleon.
If you hate the JewishMAFIA, you definitely need bifido, for the same reasons. That is, it is [almost] sure that they have witchcraft (thought-control) as part of their "business." So, lots of your detective work (& if you think of DIY punishment, too, then that also) has to have strategies that they cannot fool/stop you.
Maybe I should not generalize this one, but it seems to me that, almost everybody in the World, is suspicious about at least some secret-service of their own country and/or some foreign. Some of the most mentioned are MOSSAD, NSA, CIA, MI5, MI6, FSB (previously, KGB), MiT. They may have evil members, or some (all?) of them entirely evil, and/or governments may try to abuse the existing capabilities. For example, think about another seemingly quite suspected-and/or-hated, FBI, & then, what if some of their patently evil (thought-controller-or-conspirator) members spot you (maybe when you tipped to FBI), or maybe the rest of the "real-world" FBI "detectives" who/which may be looking for what to laugh at (your real-world) & next to be reporting you laughable to their evil comrades? In other words, if the conspiracy-theories are true even partially, then what would you do?
For example, if you would like to earn the reward that is declared by USA against some ElQaide members (& you already know that you have to do the killings manually, not trusting FBI/Jews/etc) but ElQaide (if themselves evil Jews) could be informed of it before you told it to any person, and before you arrived at a city where such targets live (maybe your local librarian or some (evil and/or "real-world" funnies) members of the mentioned "intelligence" agencies were seeing you doing your research about it, & the evil started a thought-control assault against you).
It is widely known that both CIA & KGB have done lots of mind-control (mind-states altering drugs, etc) research in their labs -- & also believed to have done thought-control (knowing-&-manipulating what specific sentences-&-emotions you think within your mind) since long ago. So, irrespective of whether CIA itself ever officially brought the things out of the laboratory, the existence of sabbataists/kabbalists/antichrist gangs in CIA (& MOSSAD, FSB, NSA, MiT, etc), means that they could be/try getting such information before you arrived there).
For example, if we may presume that, as of 2017, CIA (or, at least, the CIA branch in a given city you consider) has become completely evil (the last remaining non-evil ones having gone away one way or another), & therefore, if you would like to bust some-or-all CIA cell(s) (that/those located in your city, or if you think they do their assaults directly from Langley, you may need going into USA, too), well, then, you need to check out against their thought-control gangs, too.
BTW, presuming that Trump & Pence are normal humans (not witch), but naive, then you-or-I killing all of CIA, reminds of a Khizir (a.s.) wisdom written in the Quran, namely, killing the "bad boy(s)" such that Allah will give them good new.
BTW, if you already know the list of evil ones (for example, if you know the epigene that labels them), then you may notice their inter-relationships, too, how they pretend to be various sides of a theatre, although directly-or-indirectly, they're all conspirators of each other (such detection-&-watching may happen, at least, until you find ways to kill them, whether through that epigene, or other ways). That facilitates pinpointed punishment (that may satisfy every conscience, & not the evil), because of finally having a satisfactory method for distinguishing the really-evil trouble-makers in a herd they try to manipulate with noisy misdirections.
If you have sufficient reason for suspecting some category of people, then you may base your defenses by considering their commonly known characteristics, too. For example, you-or-I may even think that almost all Jews of our times (maybe except less than 100 (such as Jesus (a.s.)), among 55-56 million of them, including crypto-Jews) are actually heretics (because of thought-controller-&-conspirator category, & otherwise, the less-than-100 exceptionJews may also be mostly not Judaist/Christian/Muslim, yet). But that "prejudice" (or, post-judice, finalized judgment, & counting over it) need not even be true. After all, if only the bugs messing your mind have some common characteristics that most-or-all Jews have, then you may simply look outside (such as what Freud had written), to prepare traps to those bugging your mind.
BTW, example for Jewish character may be the "oedipal" behaviors of Y-Jews (those that have Jewish Y-chromosome, but not every Jew has, for example, BinLadin is maternally Jew, which makes him conspirator of Y-Jews & also willing to have hegemony but not specific characters of Y-Jews). Y-Jews look at how you do something and they imitate you and try to eliminate you from doing it, any more (if its father was interacting with its mother, it wants to overtake it,& not limited to that case). BTW, those "English" rulers of India (Disraeli?) who ordered cutting the hands of cloth/fabric makers of India (in 19th century), were probably some [Y-]Jew(s), if I may take the rival-elimination-method as its typical-Jewishness (but then, BinLadin case may be understood as either all (non-Y, too) Jews have such tendency (although not the imitation instinct of Y-Jews), or because BinLadin was simply in conspiracy with a whole JewishMAFIA which included lots of Y-Jews).
In other words, as that is their (chronic, constant, life-blood, alternativeless, & obvious-in-the-situation) habit, you may use it how you catch fish with a hook -- because fish have that ("life-sustaining") tendency to eat those worms you attach.
For example, those thieves reading my mind, are marked with that (even their most hidden ones, as long as they read the transcripts of my thoughts). Next. lie-detectors (legacy or fMRI) may look out for who knows my own word-coinages, jokes, etc, by using those as the lie-detector's probe terms. That is, with fMRI screening (or, whatever next technology comes), to find out who knows my privacy. They may try to spread the stain by inflicting it to some of their victims/puppets or through media, but in both cases (1) the marker is a good starting point (& information amount memorized from me, is a hint, too), (2) fMRI screening may show that they not only know me & my joke, but also they associate the joke with me, (3) those jokes that are not printable (such as exposing their crimes, charlatanships, or mockery specific to their or other people's names-or-surnames) are not spreadable, even in their most "unlimited"/immoral/etc media, presumably.
Naively, you may remember some examples, such as the "security" of those airports & WTC itself were all in the hands of Jews, and terrorists were successful. So, the "Jewish security" concept (or, joke?) seems to be only stupidity and obscenity (for example, as if doing obscene X-rays at airports could not be circumvented by some bomb swallowed by terrorist and bluetooth-controlled from the outside of stomach). But you should read my article about WTC 9/11. In other words, the 9/11 assaults was a trickery of the JewishMAFIA itself, not something against them. In contrast to that, now you will fight against themselves.
If your people are protected against genies & old-style witchcraft, and you have buildings-and/or-vehicles that detect-and/or-block the thought-control waves (electromagnetic, ultrasound, telepathy/infrasound, whatever), then those fort-resident people may work together with the front people, for any mission. Just plan the strategies, without forgetting that those at the fronts are more easily targetable by thought-controllers.
The individuals sent out for mission as fronts may, at least, have charms (against genies). That may qualify them to become pseudo-forts, because then, the machine-based thought-controllers may first need to find/spot them (presuming that detectors/satellites have less capacity than genies, & when they need operator attention, their personnel amount is a lot less and perhaps remote),. Therefore, your fronts-people may have "free-time" before the (evil) enemy starts trying to thought-control. Furthermore, if those machines have limited quota (how many people to follow, at a given time), then sending out lots of people to streets, may overwhelm their capacity, permanently. It is like having zillions of strategists out there, & they may fail to spot the important ones. If a (verifiably) valuable strategy is heard & practiced, then the enemy may have to spot who is doing what, before the mission reaps the results.
BTW, capacity-overwhelming itself, is a basic old trick in the toolchest, now improved with bifido pseudo-forts. For example, in 1970s, (communist block) Bulgarian agents were being camouflaged by sending out all the Bulgarian Embassy personnel in your city, to the streets that day, when some agent would do something that your police would like to know who, & watch what he/she doess.
The sent-out-for-mission people may be (1) newly noticed (remotely) & recruited (maybe after having gotten past some security walls), (2) sent out from a fortified area for mission (& if successful (& not killed/martyred by opponents), will probably return (unless occupying the target)) to the same or other fort of the senders, (3) from unknown place (activated by broadcast/publication/indirectlyThrough3rdparty) like the (1)st or (2)nd cases.
Spies & criminals have been known to (sometimes) communicate indirectly, such as publishing some advertisement in some newspaper or radio, as a signal for start-of-operation. You do not need to be a spy-or-criminal to use such methods, especially if your enemies are such types & they are trying to watch and/or steal-information.
For example, (1) you may use "double-blind" techniques to send your personnel to some mission (as detectives or executioners, etc). That is, they will not know what is happening, by simply reading the minds of those whom they see, nor by trying to find whom sent those there, or (2) publishing/broadcasting/uploading (like quarterback (later yourself reinforcing their results), and/or simply for warning all those similar to what you have witnessed) so that unknown/unvisible people (whom neither you nor those watching you see around) are activated/prepared.
A fort-without-privacy is where the thought-controllers can (possibly) assault your privacy, although they cannot physically harm-or-intervene to stop you from whatever you aim to do.
BTW, conceptually, it is equivalent to trusting Allah, for protecting you.
Likewise, if (with or without protection) you would dare fighting, as long as the alternative is that the evil would reign, as you would not be too willing to live in such a ruined world, (as if) a silent conspirator/lenient) -- & their evil-&-slobbery tyranny would always disgust you, any way (as such, "agreeableness" would only postpone your fight to a perhaps less practical time, when you have more to deal with).
Such a fort-without-privacy is sufficient for various missions (as long as your mission algorithms take care of the fact that the enemy knows the details).
For example, good for declaring your enemies as targets -- presuming that, other people may take it as a warning for defending themselves (their family, neighborhood, ...) against such unnoticed evil parasites, and/or some "front" (or, hidden) axe-people may do the detection or execution against those evil you exposed around yourself. For example, if some evil is reading your mind & you said that to FBI (don't laugh, I'm telling about what it was supposed to be, not your "real-world" FBI), then they were supposed to look around to verify the case. If they lack a fort hiding them, then the evil may hide from them, too, but that would at least disrupt the evil's business regularity (how street-patrolling of police is considered deterrent to crime), & other detection-able people (if not targeted themselves) may verify, if heard the case. Furthermore, if personA hears the case of personB but personA is also a target of the evil, then those watching personA would like to warn those watching personB that personA is looking around to catch them while they're assaulting/watching personB, but that communication may be caught by some personC (& maybe personA would also see some message sent to there, or even personB might notice it sooner or later).
That is, when publisher/quarterback is already "known"/"visible"/"circled" by the evil (perhaps decoupledly, as Allah may protect, too). "But" (for warning the publisher), I should remind that, in addition to the existing watchers, the similars may also spot you as a resourceful person, after they see your publication, and they may also come to bug you, as that turns out to be a standard practice of the antichrist/jewish gangs, that is, wherever (classmates, schoolmates, "colleagues"/poseurs/"professors", editors you have sent letters to, librarians, etc, etc) may start to bug you to steal from your mind (and/or to arrange you for some "suitor"/sex, as maybe hundred of millions of decoupled virgins (along with other decoupled victims) have been targeted after some evil saw & perhaps called its racist groupmates/relatives, too (like ants calling each other, to pick crumbs) to loot/abuse your mind, etc.)
Presumably already understood, but it is a pleasure to point out that there may be as many forts as you find practical. Not limited to a single one. Some of them may be with full privacy, some may be less featured -- but keep in mind to not send out those who have memories/things that should be kept secret, yet (as they may be targeted by thought-controllers, when out of a fort-with-privacy, & their past memories may be recalled/questioned & read).
As always, it is disgusting that thought-controllers are invading your privacy. Furthermore, as usual, keep in mind that, non-married (no relationship history, or perhaps who had "relationships" only with the enemy) may be less troubled when sent out from a fort-with-privacy to a fort-without-privacy, or as front-men out there (not to mention not to leave families fatherless, if there are extra risks).
Warning: Beware that all of this assumes that you are not trusting the evil (neither personally, nor because they have taken hold of your government/etc). That sort of treachery-based assaults have to be dealt with, too -- & thought-controllers tend to have extensive treachery/trickery systems (such as Protocols-of-Zions, & what masonism (over the centuries, especially after containing lots of evil Jews) has eventually converged to). The most-evil-ever have been "trusted" by naive people, & so, having treachery personnell installed in other groups/organizations/states, to manipulate the results manually, too. BTW, as concerns state-based treachery, for example, if the conspiracy-theory that the ruling (government/state) tribe of Syria is actually Jews, & they did that favor to Israel by arranging Israel kill some non-Jew pilots of Syria in 6-days war, then those pilots may have been in jets which were tuned-&-located to be easy targets to Israeli jets.
Depending on your real-world constraints, you may prepare your wish-lists for your (money-making) business(es), too. For example, when I watched a video that listed a few people with the MoneyControl=WorldControl concerns, then I listed not only barter as a well-known remedy, but also referred to firmaze, & how it fits to optimize (surfing or what) the highs-&-lows of the economy. Namely, by investing further when your projects have been generating profits, while investing less, if the economy (as you have been probing with your businesses), seems to be less fruitful -- & that now may remind of how bifido wish-lists work, too.
I had referred to "stomach-power" at the money-control page, too. In context of bifido, it is worthy of mention, for at least two aspects, (1) (as AgeOfEmpires quoted) "an army walks on its stomach" & so, having sturdy business is good for remaining capable of fighting (even if not necessary for all), other than confiscating the evil/enemy (and/or earning the reward declared for the heads of their members (such as ElQaide is listed fugitives through FBI publicly (& unless (non-Jew)people will do it, maybe for reward money, it is not likely to happen, as Jews won't kill ElQaide/ISIS (themselves))) & then you may use it as war-finance to further harm themselves, (2) as in the case of WTC (& perhaps almost all the crimes that have happened in USA, in the last century), the crime is happening because some (Jew-or-conspirator) evil wants to eliminate some honest/"obstacle"/rival/capable person. Laws broken when (1) some Jew breaks it (for profit/influence or rape/witchcraft), (2) Jew puppetizes someone to commit the crime (results/fruits again indicate the Jews), (3) somebody responds to those crimes by killing them, & therefore, having business to crush the evil, is part of the war, as that is what motivates them most to harm the rest of us.
Business is not only about making money (let alone being only "making profit"), as you may need to do your own, if not necessarily trusting others (whther about security, or availability). Therefore, if you really need it, you should really know how to do it, for having that option to have it without compromises. For example, if your food supply is not in your own control, you will have to increase your food-testing capability (unless you trust your suppliers a lot for it), or take chances with (at least) portions of your population. Similarly, weaponry may have bugs installed in them. Some self-sufficiency is preferrable. Beyond that, some extras may be buyable, too, if not risking yourself beyond its worth. (Remember to make things easier for yourself, for example, by preferring the producers-&-sellers-&-cargo that do not hire your enemies/Jews-&-conspirators, for not to have entrusted your well-being to their potential treachery.)
((LenskiPoison (the likes of the fallacies of Lenski, if you commit to absurd optimisims about the food supply availale at the market (or, Arabs/etc trusting Jews as their gadgets-and/or-foods supplier), while they/JewishMAFIA may be very intent/accustomed to commit such assaults when they fin it necessary or useful))
Constraints (things that have to be considered in a specification, and then, in real-life, they may turn out to make "your" former plans impractical) may be actually helpful to you -- especially, if/when those interfering constraints derail some "plan" imposed to your mind by some evil.
For example, from the existing manually-fighting martial arts systems, how Wing Chun (&, thereby, Jeet Kune Do) & with different strategy also (real) Tai Chi both fit to bifido is, respectively, their (1) dominating-the-centerline-&-interception-with-a-fist, & (2) the having-trained-for-possible-maneuvers-to-counteract-against-& looking-for-opportunities-to-match-those-to-the-acts-of-the-opponent. Why thought-controllers cannot derail these aspects, is because they are FIXED rules (you could call them almost "static" (over time) although dynamic (ready) for every moment) and so, irrespective of how many seconds the opponent may inflict whims to your mind, the moment he/she/it falls to a situation (a constraint for him/her/it) you know how to handle, then he/she/it is caught at it (unless they have stolen from your mind or somebody else's mind a technique that works against your technique).
In contrast, the sort of (high-kicking, etc.) "positive-fighting" (external style) Kung Fu (not looking like quite "real Chen Tai Chi" to me) you see in some (most?) videos out there (some "Chen Tai Chi" tournament finals, Tai-Chi-vs-other-style tournaments), seem quite vulnerable to manipulation by thought-controllers.
Actually, I have thought (just thinking, yet) some further styles (fitting to those of us who may have fast designer/programmer/debugger/debunker minds) to do design-&-constraints-based (not only analysis-&-react-based) bifido, too, but the essentials w.r.t what exists out there, is that it is nice to have a firm strength in the offense-through-defense techniques, not to let the evil establish some evil progress.
BTW, that is not limited to feet-&-fists fighting. To defend your business against thought-controllers, is quite similar, as they would like to build their following evil plans, upon your falling to their previous attempts -- if you have no way of return.
In other words, break their traps, return to your firm basis (or, wish-list(s)), & trap (& harm) them when they attempt, instead of "trying your chances" wildly.
To make the best of the constraints, whether they are constraints that limit you or your enemy, you should have related items ready in your wish-list(s) (maybe a large repertoire of what-else-to-do, or some sure-fire-method-to-fall-back-to, or what harms your enemy most)
-- or, upon weighing the new opportunities, sometimes, you may prefer adding them into your wish-list(s), too, if they fulfill your overall constraints (religious, etc).
BTW, religious constraints themselves, have been useful against lots of abusers -- if your religion has such constraints that block away what those abusers lobby to you.
BTW, I presume that the thought-controllers-&-conspirators are all cursedly stupids ("but" living parasitic (as abusers) to their victims' minds). Both your & their actions may harm them -- as long as you are determined to harm them infinitely/boundlessly, in contrast to leniency/hesitation/etc. So, their harmful plan that was a trap against you, may start to harm themselves.
BTW, while at it, if you notice that something-in-your-mind (other than yourself) is like urging you continuing with a plan that has become impractical because of the new constraints, then you may notice that as a possible cue about what trap they have prepared against you. But (because you know the other trickery) they may try to use that in a stream-of-lies, too, for diverting you from something that is actually useful. Therefore, at least, the manipulation is noticed, & then you need to think.
As concerns the conspiracy-theory that "Jews have had no successes, at all" (such as all of their Nobels being either stolen content or confessional (& then, lobbying into minds of the Nobel jury)), one may wonder how did they (if the theory is/were right), made it in chess championships, too. Not that I value chess (neither personal preference, nor after learning in cognitive psychology that chess-mastership is mainly rote-memorization-based) but it is a question worthy of solving about a seemingly openly played tournaments category. Now, consider the (Jewish-or-not, but necessarily thought-controller) chess poseurs, & how to play against them:
Your using the environment to the fullest, makes the "zeitgeistly" thieves (the thought-controllers which read your mind) less able to ask it to others (for finding some way to fight back against you). That is, unlike a chess-board that is quickly summarizable & remotely askable to a chess-master's mind). That is, the more details you have significant/substantial plans to work with profitably, they have to carry that information as part of the question, to someone who is not there around you, and while doing such carrying, they may make lots of communication errors (such as children's games where each relays what she/he heard from one side to the other side, but so often, the message is changed from one end (start), to the other side.
Furthermore, if you're alone (that is, not needing to explain your plans to others with full words/reports/briefings/etc), you may think with words you make your own jargon that is not necessarilty 1-to-1 translatable to any language. That is, your own little language(s) that you understand very well (not confusing you), but others may have trouble in adopting/translating.
Those who read your mind (& then they make plans based on that), may all be harmed.
For example, if your thoughts were misleading to them, or if after they took their "illuminatedly" positioned stands (like dead-end streets), then you (bifido-style) changed your plan (after seeing what some/all of them have done).
This sort of trolling (& anything that capitalizes on the accumulated results), may be considered a category of (developed-over-time) constraints -- and/or a sort of wish-list item.
As a constraints subcategory, you may like to call it active constraints (in contrast to what may just happen without any of your actions or responses), dynamic constraints (not static but developing/modifiable/modified), or situational constraints.
When something goes wrong, you may have alternatives of it, and afterward, something else changes, & you may just resume from where it was left unfinished.
Make their resources burden against themselves.
keep rational, reasonable, do NOT try to confuse your own mind ("to confuse them"), & similarly, do not even try to "randomize"/jerk your mind (as if dodging sniper bullets, so that "they cannot follow"). Trust it that, they will be more confused that way (because that way, they cannot impose their whim (or, their most urgent needs) into your mind as questions-or-requests (through heckling-with-SLP(subliminal-perception), or with the/a synchronous evil, into your mind) to derail you (to fit their plan whenever they need it), and therefore, they also have lots of problems to solve, as you are not co-operating with them. (I presume (from experience) that they are only stupid "zeitgeistly" thieves, the antichrist gangs (cursedly stupid parasites), and therefore, all you need (& all you can) is just NOT-compromising-with-them, keep continuing to harm them, by attending to the real-life constraints & using those constraints to harm those enemies the most.)
I present bifido as a powerful defense tool for nullifying the advantages of thought-controllers. Furthermore, their own attempts, may disadvantage themselves, for example, if your following actions corner them because of the results of their accumulated actions.
I have piled-&-designed bifido, as a compilation of how I have thought so far (when problems surfaced), and then as a research framework to think more of it (and to speed up the (successful) response time if-or-when some new problem surfaces in the future).
Actually, (not to do false-modesty but for locating things rightly), one may eventually conclude that every piece of bifido turns out to be priorly heard concepts (& I'm not writing a Ph.D. thesis here, therefore, not necessary to pinpoint the originality, any way), and I use them as well-known best-practices-based modules. Well, that itself, is a human thing, that is, presenting old methods, for new problems, when applicable. For example, to the concerns of people about "MoneyControl=WorldControl" (& generally, about economy-based powerlessness of individuals), then I suggested barter (along with a few optional dynamics for dealing with economy, too). In other words, the remedy, in both cases, may seem "old" but how (or, when) I presented them, they are really against some evil trouble potentials.
Furthermore, in the bifido case, some other similar-looking systems may become upside-down because of the false assumptions (as they ignore how thought-controllers read-&-manipulate your mind-&-body). Therefore, a well-thought design (system-analysis) that deals with the trouble we face, is a good thing to know by name -- even if not necessarily very original. (By the way, the term best-practices, also reminds of something I had pointed out as a suggestion priorly. Namely, if-or-when thought-controllers are bugging your mind and they may patent them before you do, then it is counter-indicated to invent sth new, and instead of that, you may use the expired patents against them. Now, bifido is fitting that philosophy, too, by using the existing, in making personalized products, personalizedly fine-tuned designs.)
For example, some concepts may sound like those of Tai Chi Chuan or Jeet Kune Do, that actually I also have noticed at some point in time, but when thinking further or compare-&-contrast the terms, there may be some divergence, too, or their practitioners may revise their own, by considering the concerns that have motivated bifido. [0]
If you have some mastery of a well-packaged system (like Tai Chi, or Daito-ryu Aiki Jujutsu), then you may consider that as your-existing-self (a few b[i]F[i] of yourself). If your main system is eclectic such as (Jeet Kune Do, or any bag of (so-called) "MMA" (Mixed Martial Arts)), then you may supplement-or-revise that with the risk-alerts & suggestions of bifido
When the evil exist, the situation-&-results may be any one or combinations of the 3 likelihoods. Namely, (1) ignorance (2) knowing-&-fighting (3) having methods for immediately exterminating the evil.
bifido (having to & knowing how to fight) is in the middle, a bit overlapping both of the 1st & 3rd cases, too, between (3) havingProtectionForSure (like witch-epigene-hunting, & then, bifido may help you relocate-or-hide yourself when the targets are not immediately findable), & (1) havingBeenIgnorant&PracticallyFallen (drivenByEvil/illusioned/ignorant(withWastedLifeTimes&havingBadMemoriesBut[Almost]NoTangible(or,nonePerpetuating)Disgusting(Embarrassing(rapekids/nudity(bodyKnownToAll)/etc))SideEffectsThatRemain), redemption-compatible)decoupledness, & then, it relates to a bifido-ka (bifido practitioner) as he/she may also have a past (or, people around him/her who have been badly victimized) & not necessarily knowing all of the enemy systems, yet, despite mounting counter-attacks to their various dimensions, already)
[0] "Disclaimer": At least, as of the first publishing about bifido (Jan.19,2018), I have never attended even a single hand-to-hand combat lesson (such as Judo/Karate/TaiChi), although having read various documents and watched films and training videos (without any serious amount of doing the exercises myself). Therefore, some of you may still wonder "What makes him an authority in (at least) foot-&-fist aspects of fighting, if he has never broken even a single brick (maybe except by inadvertently dropping it)?" But those I list are the necessary aspects, and I value things that are necessary. Furthermore, I may readily imagine myself having a prop (such as a glove that has [electro]kinetic-boosted-power-&-internal-damper) to break concrete walls. Therefore, well, ehm, let's get started with bifido, as it is the important stuff.
For example, the pun "beefy" in the name-history of bifido (you could think of it as hard-core, too), may resemble Tan Tien (or, Chi) that the Tai Chi Chuan people talk about, and a Tai Chi grandmaster (in TV interview I watched) even referred to facing accidents that would cause losing balance, too, but it is not obvious whether he or others would be as ready (if not warned beforehand) about the really-hidden-thieves (thought-controllers) that are not visible externally (in contrast to a piece of nylon bag you see there on the floor), and even in that interview, one in the audience said it saved him years of efforts when he was pointed his actual balanced-posture, & I hope a well-trained person can do a re-adjustment-of-balance in split-second, because that is necessary when a crippled or hyper-active evil becomes in-synchrony-with-your-body while you are in a fight (or, sports match, (SpecOps) hell-week tests, etc) -- furthermore, if they know your sequences-of-behavior habits, they may write a replay (like a stream-of-consciousness series of thoughts, imposed by satans, mixed up from your regular thoughts, but some faults inserted in there, or some accident prepared for you, while you are occupied with that attention-diverter). (That is, if the bug-in-synch is a lot less effective than the targeted (hard-core) victim, then maybe no significant problem will happen (that is what the pun "beefy" stands for), but they may still try to induce jerky-actions, by abusing your brain against your own free-will.)
In case of Jeet Kune Do, for example, trying to hide your intentions, fits bifido, as stated such, but the enemy is not only looking at your leg positions; it is reading your mind & may try to manipulate you to "feel like" making the posture that the evil one is then prepared to respond to at the moment (like some poseurs/"professors" may drop (into the mind(s) of some in the audience) the questions they want from the audience, for next to be able to pretend "answering some asked-question").
Furthermore, I may list one of my most popular quotes from the foreword of a textbook (I had read it 29 years, ago, OperatingSystems), along with a quote from JeetKuneDo (BruceLee), and despite, at first, the latter may sound the opposite of the first, actually, in this case, they reinforce the point now I'm making. They said (paraphrasing) "some students write programs without designing priorly, by sitting in front of a terminal, typing it and then trying to make it work by debugging. In this course, that strategy may cause you sit there very very long." and Bruce Lee said "martial art styles are like dry land swimming, while fight is dynamic." To me, they are both the same, because you have to have the necessary set of abilities (your program has to have sufficient algorithms) for any condition that may happen. Otherwise, just "exercising" daily, may leave lots of untested bugs in your routines.
[1] "Jeet Kune Do - Wikipedia" Retrieved October 15, 2016
[2] Cruickshank,P. (May 2017). "A View from the CT Foxhole: James A. Gagliano, Former FBI Hostage Rescue Team Counterterrorist Operator", CTC Sentinel, v.10(5), Retrieved August 13, 2017, from https://www.ctc.usma.edu/v2/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/CTC-Sentinel_Vol10Iss517.pdf ( through https://ctc.usma.edu/posts/may-2017 ).
[3] ct:WTC
[4] remedy against "MoneyControl=WorldControl"
[5] witch-epigene
[7] Arduino-firewall
I had published that article in January 2015, and (despite lots of other extra ideas yet remain to be published), it remains as a valuable defense tool & metaphor, too).
By-the-way, in September 2016, I noticed that the Nicolelis experiment I referred to (not in the article, but in the references section) was not necessarily a demonstration of the in-synchrony thought-control, despite my first reading of the Wired magazine article referring to that experiment of that Nicolelis team seemed so (& the 2016 re-thinking was again by re-reading that Wired article, not by reading the Nicolelis paper, yet). Now presuming that the method-fault which I suspect may have been committed (namely, if in the 2nd phase, they did not use some new mice, but those "unsuccessful" mice of the first round of the experiment, as in that case, it may explain how they may get a significant result in not-necessarily-significant setting), and because other people later published real in-synch situations (such as the U.Washington experiment for over-the-network-game-playing-with-remote-hand-manipulating) then that exemplifies a few bifido principles, such as, (1) do-not-give-up-what-you-know-when-others-turn-out-to-be-faulty (in general, especially because traitors may infiltrate your group to hijack it to some excess and then to abolish, and/or thought-controllers may try to confuse you to become suspicious of "the whole thing" you had yourself known very well), (2) even if the options that existed in your bifido-wish-list did not happen yet they may still appear afterward and then you may use it (like the later experiment results now referrable to, as the lab-based proofs), (3) oh. yes, one should read/evaluate attentively before presuming that sth is just echoing what yourself already had known personally (but in this case, it is the thing about some mice having had expectations about what [not] to expect/retry, a detail you could miss, at first reading).
[8] Henry Ford and the editors of Dearborn Independent (1920~). "The International Jew" Retrieved July29,2011, from http://www.archive.org/details/TheInternationalJew , & http://www.archive.org/details/TheInternationalJew_655 (Internet editions (as .pdf), generally contain all 4 volumes of the book as a single .pdf, although I may refer to individual articles as newspaper publication date and/or volume-&-article-number-both-in-that-volume-&-within-all-four
BTW, maybe you have also heard that Henry Ford is mentioned as "mason" (freemasonry, "scottish" rite), and by deduction, you would perhaps conclude he is actually evil, despite exposing the/a backbone of evil in his book. Well, masonism has a long history, and I presume that, as of our day, all masons are in the (absolutely evil) thought-controllers-&-conspirators category. Jewish masonic masters had existed in the times of Henry Ford, too, but afterward less-&-less people may have entered masonism, if not willing to be the "brothers" of those Jews -- & by extension, the conspirators of all Jews endorsable by those masonic Jews, irrespective of what objections ("theses") that (today's) mason may have raised against some Jews outside. Actually, Jews themselves pretend like fighting each other such noisily outside that, you could think they are the most polar opposites of each other, while I think they are conspirators of each other (presumably, except the exceptionJews (less than 2-in-million of 55-56 million (cryptoJews included) Jews?)) that really refrain-from-&-hate thought-controllers, no matter what). (This paragraph need not be accurate (as I just did numeric istihare, where I lacked published data, but results seemed plausible to me, given that in times of Jesus (a.s.), those choosing/helping him were about 1-in-100000, & Hitler has (inadvertently) played into hands of hereticJews despite his book having warnings (btw, even the majority of the exceptionJews may be "heretics" if you would ask to Moses (a.s.), but when I talk about the hereticJews hatefully, I'm especially pointing out that witchcraft (thought-control) is NOT compatible with any of Judaism/Christianity/Islam (& Confucius hated it, too, btw)), I have the right to base my defenses on such distancing-&-not-trusting, & if you ever tell me about your troubles which happened because of not doing the same, then I may respond "Why did you trust them?")
[8.1] "Does Jewish Power Control the World Press?" (published in The Dearborn Independent issue of 11 September 1920 (& in the book, volume 1, 17th article).