Ready.
This document is an arm of the bifido machinery.
If you wish finding all of it as a single webpage, see the bifido (all).
[0] "Disclaimer": At least, as of the first publishing about bifido (Jan.19,2018), I have never attended even a single hand-to-hand combat lesson (such as Judo/Karate/TaiChi), although having read various documents and watched films and training videos (without any serious amount of doing the exercises myself). Therefore, some of you may still wonder "What makes him an authority in (at least) foot-&-fist aspects of fighting, if he has never broken even a single brick (maybe except by inadvertently dropping it)?" But those I list are the necessary aspects, and I value things that are necessary. Furthermore, I may readily imagine myself having a prop (such as a glove that has [electro]kinetic-boosted-power-&-internal-damper) to break concrete walls. Therefore, well, ehm, let's get started with bifido, as it is the important stuff.
For example, the pun "beefy" in the name-history of bifido (you could think of it as hard-core, too), may resemble Tan Tien (or, Chi) that the Tai Chi Chuan people talk about, and a Tai Chi grandmaster (in TV interview I watched) even referred to facing accidents that would cause losing balance, too, but it is not obvious whether he or others would be as ready (if not warned beforehand) about the really-hidden-thieves (thought-controllers) that are not visible externally (in contrast to a piece of nylon bag you see there on the floor), and even in that interview, one in the audience said it saved him years of efforts when he was pointed his actual balanced-posture, & I hope a well-trained person can do a re-adjustment-of-balance in split-second, because that is necessary when a crippled or hyper-active evil becomes in-synchrony-with-your-body while you are in a fight (or, sports match, (SpecOps) hell-week tests, etc) -- furthermore, if they know your sequences-of-behavior habits, they may write a replay (like a stream-of-consciousness series of thoughts, imposed by satans, mixed up from your regular thoughts, but some faults inserted in there, or some accident prepared for you, while you are occupied with that attention-diverter). (That is, if the bug-in-synch is a lot less effective than the targeted (hard-core) victim, then maybe no significant problem will happen (that is what the pun "beefy" stands for), but they may still try to induce jerky-actions, by abusing your brain against your own free-will.)
In case of Jeet Kune Do, for example, trying to hide your intentions, fits bifido, as stated such, but the enemy is not only looking at your leg positions; it is reading your mind & may try to manipulate you to "feel like" making the posture that the evil one is then prepared to respond to at the moment (like some poseurs/"professors" may drop (into the mind(s) of some in the audience) the questions they want from the audience, for next to be able to pretend "answering some asked-question").
Furthermore, I may list one of my most popular quotes from the foreword of a textbook (I had read it 29 years, ago, OperatingSystems), along with a quote from JeetKuneDo (BruceLee), and despite, at first, the latter may sound the opposite of the first, actually, in this case, they reinforce the point now I'm making. They said (paraphrasing) "some students write programs without designing priorly, by sitting in front of a terminal, typing it and then trying to make it work by debugging. In this course, that strategy may cause you sit there very very long." and Bruce Lee said "martial art styles are like dry land swimming, while fight is dynamic." To me, they are both the same, because you have to have the necessary set of abilities (your program has to have sufficient algorithms) for any condition that may happen. Otherwise, just "exercising" daily, may leave lots of untested bugs in your routines.
[1] "Jeet Kune Do - Wikipedia" Retrieved October 15, 2016
[2] Cruickshank,P. (May 2017). "A View from the CT Foxhole: James A. Gagliano, Former FBI Hostage Rescue Team Counterterrorist Operator", CTC Sentinel, v.10(5), Retrieved August 13, 2017, from https://www.ctc.usma.edu/v2/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/CTC-Sentinel_Vol10Iss517.pdf ( through https://ctc.usma.edu/posts/may-2017 ).
[3] ct:WTC
[4] remedy against "MoneyControl=WorldControl"
[5] witch-epigene
[7] Arduino-firewall
I had published that article in January 2015, and (despite lots of other extra ideas yet remain to be published), it remains as a valuable defense tool & metaphor, too).
By-the-way, in September 2016, I noticed that the Nicolelis experiment I referred to (not in the article, but in the references section) was not necessarily a demonstration of the in-synchrony thought-control, despite my first reading of the Wired magazine article referring to that experiment of that Nicolelis team seemed so (& the 2016 re-thinking was again by re-reading that Wired article, not by reading the Nicolelis paper, yet). Now presuming that the method-fault which I suspect may have been committed (namely, if in the 2nd phase, they did not use some new mice, but those "unsuccessful" mice of the first round of the experiment, as in that case, it may explain how they may get a significant result in not-necessarily-significant setting), and because other people later published real in-synch situations (such as the U.Washington experiment for over-the-network-game-playing-with-remote-hand-manipulating) then that exemplifies a few bifido principles, such as, (1) do-not-give-up-what-you-know-when-others-turn-out-to-be-faulty (in general, especially because traitors may infiltrate your group to hijack it to some excess and then to abolish, and/or thought-controllers may try to confuse you to become suspicious of "the whole thing" you had yourself known very well), (2) even if the options that existed in your bifido-wish-list did not happen yet they may still appear afterward and then you may use it (like the later experiment results now referrable to, as the lab-based proofs), (3) oh. yes, one should read/evaluate attentively before presuming that sth is just echoing what yourself already had known personally (but in this case, it is the thing about some mice having had expectations about what [not] to expect/retry, a detail you could miss, at first reading).
[8] Henry Ford and the editors of Dearborn Independent (1920~). "The International Jew" Retrieved July29,2011, from http://www.archive.org/details/TheInternationalJew , & http://www.archive.org/details/TheInternationalJew_655 (Internet editions (as .pdf), generally contain all 4 volumes of the book as a single .pdf, although I may refer to individual articles as newspaper publication date and/or volume-&-article-number-both-in-that-volume-&-within-all-four
BTW, maybe you have also heard that Henry Ford is mentioned as "mason" (freemasonry, "scottish" rite), and by deduction, you would perhaps conclude he is actually evil, despite exposing the/a backbone of evil in his book. Well, masonism has a long history, and I presume that, as of our day, all masons are in the (absolutely evil) thought-controllers-&-conspirators category. Jewish masonic masters had existed in the times of Henry Ford, too, but afterward less-&-less people may have entered masonism, if not willing to be the "brothers" of those Jews -- & by extension, the conspirators of all Jews endorsable by those masonic Jews, irrespective of what objections ("theses") that (today's) mason may have raised against some Jews outside. Actually, Jews themselves pretend like fighting each other such noisily outside that, you could think they are the most polar opposites of each other, while I think they are conspirators of each other (presumably, except the exceptionJews (less than 2-in-million of 55-56 million (cryptoJews included) Jews?)) that really refrain-from-&-hate thought-controllers, no matter what). (This paragraph need not be accurate (as I just did numeric istihare, where I lacked published data, but results seemed plausible to me, given that in times of Jesus (a.s.), those choosing/helping him were about 1-in-100000, & Hitler has (inadvertently) played into hands of hereticJews despite his book having warnings (btw, even the majority of the exceptionJews may be "heretics" if you would ask to Moses (a.s.), but when I talk about the hereticJews hatefully, I'm especially pointing out that witchcraft (thought-control) is NOT compatible with any of Judaism/Christianity/Islam (& Confucius hated it, too, btw)), I have the right to base my defenses on such distancing-&-not-trusting, & if you ever tell me about your troubles which happened because of not doing the same, then I may respond "Why did you trust them?")
[8.1] "Does Jewish Power Control the World Press?" (published in The Dearborn Independent issue of 11 September 1920 (& in the book, volume 1, 17th article).